The “Fuck You Elmo”

Are you prepared for this future?
Are you prepared for this future?

The Supreme Court is debating the f-word. You know–that one. No, not “flag”. No, not “founding fathers.” No, not “freedom” either. Yeah. That one. And since they couldn’t say it, I won’t say it either… not until the next parapraph.

The problem at hand is the use of swear words as “fleeting expletives” — that is, the utterance of words that are graphic or sexual but used in a way that is devoid of their meaning. An example of this type of language came from Bono’s 2003 Golden Globe acceptance speech in which he said it was “fucking brilliant.” The court wondered if that sort of usage might lead to a character from a children’s program (for literary sake let’s say Elmo) describing how he might “fuck the shit out of someone” (for example, Abby Cadabby.)

Presumably it’s OK for Bono to say it because, well, he’s totally awesome and has done more for the world than Ghandi, Mother Theresa, and Mr. Rogers combined. Oh, and his usage is completely devoid of sexual content. On the other hand, it would be wrong for Elmo to say it because he’s a foul mouthed, syphilitic, drug addict. And since his intent behind use of the word “fuck” is clearly carnal, that has to be the difference, right? Because it is the same word in either case… right?

Well, just so you know that your Supreme Court justices are on the ball. Take a look at this fucking awesome banter:

“Why do you think the F-word has shocking value?” Roberts asked rhetorically. “It’s because it’s associated with sexual or excretory activity; that’s what gives it its force.”

Excretory? Um, well OK Justice Roberts, we know how you roll.

Added Scalia, “That’s what gives it its’ zing.”

Zing indeed!

Really, what is a at stake here are the usual puritanical interests obsessesd with the slippery slope — queue visions of Elmo raping old ladies on the street and (this is really a quote from the case) “Big Bird dropping the F-bomb on Sesame Street.”

Now before you go out and start picketing Elmo dolls at K&B Toys, check out this Steven Pinker article from the Atlantic.

…over time, taboo words relinquish their literal meanings and retain only a coloring of emotion, and then just an ability to arouse attention. This progression explains why many speakers are unaware that sucker, sucks, bites, and blows originally referred to fellatio, or that a jerk was a masturbator. It explains why Close the fucking door,What the fuck?, Holy Fuck!, and Fuck you! violate all rules of English syntax and semantics—they presumably replaced Close the damned door, What in Hell?, Holy Mary!, and Damn you! when religious profanity lost its zing and new words had to be recruited to wake listeners up.

That is what the Supreme Court is faced with deciding.

Late Breaking Edit: Check out this youtubery from the TV.


5 Responses

  1. Question: Does Obama have ideas of putting policies in place that would increase government presence in our daily lives? Because I’ve heard my dad bitching about it an awful lot lately and I’m not sure if it’s right or not. Having said that I voted against Bush 4 years ago because I did not want to see Christian-ruled people appointed to the Supreme Court and therefore allow their believes to trickle down into what they think is constitutional, or not, for me to do. This seems an awful lot like the government being in a place that isn’t their FUCKING business. (used here as an adjective)

  2. Well, being a democrat, it would follow that Obama is at least not anti-government. Now is that presence interfering or useful? Depends who you ask.

    But I think it is hard to connect the dots to this story, except as you point out in the manner of future Supreme Court nominees. Though, this according to Wikipedia:

    The FCC is directed by five Commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 5-year terms, except when filling an unexpired term. The President designates one of the Commissioners to serve as Chairperson. Only three Commissioners may be members of the same political party. None of them may have a financial interest in any Commission-related business.

    So the FCC has the appearance of being multilateral.

  3. “Excretory? Um, well OK Justice Roberts, we know how you roll.”

    Brain, OMG, I can’t breathe I’m laughing so … omg, you just kill me! you really do!!

    And Abby Cadabby … LOL … omg, stop, ok?

  4. What is the context that they are deciding this? Its ridiculous that words like this can have such power that our government needs to sensor them from television and such. I think the use of the words and their power and the idea that the supreme court is discussing it says a lot about our country as a whole. For now, our government is all up in our faces, down our pants, in our heads and in our bedrooms while they proclaim our devotion to being a freedom lovin nation.

    Its really pretty fucking dumb.

  5. […] It was about this time that a Brain Skarpowsky and Roger Norling joined the editorial staff. Brain’s characteristic wit and charm is clearly seen in this probing assesment of a recent Supreme Court case: The Fuck You Elmo. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: